Amazon Nova Models – Speed & Performance Insights
Amazon Nova Models – Speed & Performance Insights
Amazon has introduced the Nova family of foundation models on Amazon Bedrock, tailored for various use cases across cost, speed, and multimodal capabilities. Here’s a breakdown of the core Nova models:
- Nova Micro: Text-only model offering lowest latency and cost.
- Nova Lite: Ultra-fast multimodal model handling text, image, and video inputs at low cost.
- Nova Pro: Balanced, high-performing multimodal model optimized for speed, cost, and accuracy.
- Nova Canvas: Advanced model for image generation.
- Nova Reel: Specialized model for video generation.
⏱️ Speed Comparison
Time Comparisons for different models were tested with a prompt containing chat history, query and knowledge base retrieved data.
Model Name | Run 1 (s) | Run 2 (s) | Run 3 (s) | Average Time (s) |
---|---|---|---|---|
anthropic.claude-3-sonnet-20240229-v1:0 | 64.82 | 58.3 | 58.91 | 60.68 |
anthropic.claude-3.5-sonnet-20240620-v1:0 | 56.67 | 57.94 | 59.79 | 58.13 |
anthropic.claude-3-haiku-20240307-v1:0 | 41.27 | 41.95 | 44.17 | 42.46 |
anthropic.claude-3.5-haiku-20241022-v1:0 | 53.66 | 51.91 | 54.18 | 53.25 |
amazon.nova-micro-v1:0 | 33.59 | 35.3 | 34.28 | 34.39 |
amazon.nova-lite-v1:0 | 34.83 | 35.12 | 34.14 | 34.70 |
amazon.nova-pro-v1:0 | 36.95 | 37.44 | 36.5 | 36.96 |
🔍 Key Observations
- Nova Micro is the fastest among all tested models, followed closely by Nova Lite.
- Nova Pro offers the best quality-to-speed balance, making it ideal for production-grade multimodal tasks.
- Among Anthropic models showed the most improved quality, but still lags behind Nova models in speed.
- Among the Anthropic models, Sonnet 3 and Sonnet 3.5 takes largest time.
- Nova Pro and Haiku 3.5 provide better response quality compared to Nova Micro and Lite, useful for tasks needing deeper reasoning.
🔗 References
- Amazon Bedrock – Nova Foundation Models
- Amazon Nova User Guide (Docs)
- Nova Technical Report and Model Card (PDF)
This post is licensed under CC BY 4.0 by the author.